Russia: Evidence Proves US, UK And Israel Orchestrated 9/11 Attacks

Eleven

The 9/11 attacks on New York & Washington DC were committed by traitors within the US, UK and Israeli governments.

A retired officer specialising in Israeli counter intelligence has claimed that nuclear devices were used on 9/11 – and were a modified version of the W-54 artillery shells that were provided to the Israeli’s between 1988 and 1998 from US stockpiles.

According to the Russian insider – chemical analysis done on the fallout at ground zero has identified the chemical/radiation footprint of the warheads used in the attacks as being of US/Israeli origin.

Usapoliticstoday.com reports:

All plutonium based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the Israelis and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was going on Wall Street etc. According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editor’s note: Document received and confirmed)

Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop them in place. The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.

Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72 hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now seeing in NYC amongst first responders.

Learn more: http://yournewswire.com/russia-evidence-proves-us-uk-and-israel-orchestrated-911-attacks/

Russian Nightwolves: The Nazi Comrades Of Putin

Bikers-2The Night-wolves motorcycle club leader, Alexander Zaldostanov, with Vladimir Putin. Photo credit: Ivan Sekretarev / AP (2011)

By Johan van Dongen and Joel Savage

They are the Russian Nationalist Bikers Group, called the Russian Night-wolves, also known as the “Putin’s Angels.”  At their Donbass chapter headquarters, in the eastern Ukrainian province of Luhansk,  the motorcycle club, which has over 5,000 members, identifies their background with the motto: “Where we are, there is Russia.”

What are ‘Putin’s Angels fighting for? President Vladimir Putin accompany  the bikers regularly on his own Harley-Davidson tricycle and he loves to be photographed together with the group’s leader Aleksander Zaldostanov, nicknamed ‘Surgeon.’ I’m happy that he is not a micro-surgeon and as a micro-surgeon, I wouldn’t even dream to give him a face-lift, because we can possibly recognize the ugly face of the one who shot down the MH17, by the orders of Putin, together with the corrupt Russian generals, operating mafioso system and selling polonium to the highest bidder.

We have to consider Alexander  Zaldostanov as friend of one of the most powerful person in the world, Vladimir Putin, in this way, able to commit any crime he is told. The Washington Post put the group on the sanction list, partly because of the kidnapping of an Ukrainian border guard. The Night-wolves see themselves as defenders of  Russian traditional values and thus; require to leave your wife, children and your house behind.

That’s what the deputy commander of Donbass chapter, Denis Kuznetsov thinks about of being a member of the Night-wolves. Half a year ago, he got on his motorcycle and left everything behind in Moscow, to support the pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine with thousands of Night-wolves, armed by Putin. “That’s patriotism,” he said.

“When I look at all the military stuff here, I’m proud of Russia and I realize that we have something to face the Americans. They would not dare to push the button of a rocket but we do.In Soviet times, was the army and far-from-our-bed, now we feel much closer. The army is here romanticized, and I think something good. If we do not educate our children, will Americans do in our place, as in Ukraine …, ” said Zaldostanov, the so-called criminal leader of Putin’s favorite motor gang.

Members of the Night Wolves, have fought on the side of pro-Russian militants during the Crimean crisis and war in Donbass, at the site of of the plane crash. They have blockaded the main routes into Sevastopol and participated in attacks on a natural gas facility and the naval headquarters in the city. In April 2015, Agence France-Presse stated that Alexei Vereshchyagin, a biker and one of Putin’s friends, had fought against Ukrainian government forces in  Luhansk.

In December 2014, the United States announced sanctions against the Night Wolves due to their involvement in attacks on a gas distribution station in Strikolkove and the Ukrainian naval headquarters, in Sevastopol, and recruitment of fighters for the war in Donbass. They hope for an independent state in eastern Ukraine. But the new Russia hasn’t yet fallen into the hands of the rebels. The fierce fighting came to a halt last year in the area now a frozen conflict zone.

A branch of motorcycle gang Night Wolves, has sworn allegiance to none other than Vladimir Putin, that they are still ready to fight. They are heavily equipped and able to buy another rocket like a BUK. It may be likely that Putin will be assassinated by progressive and democratic Russians. This can happen.

Suggestion

The plausibility of the first launch area presented by Almaz-Antey was already discussed in a previous Bellingcat investigation. That investigation analyzed situation maps, satellite imagery, and press reports from the area and arrived at the following main conclusions: The Almaz-Antey launch area presented on 2 June 2015, was under Russian control, and there were no Ukrainian troops in the area on 17 July 2014.

Also, there were no Ukrainian Buks in the proposed launch area on 17 July 2014. However, there is not enough information to reject a missile launch from the area. Because there are relevant differences between Almaz-Antey’s old launch area and its two new launch areas. It should be asked whether these conclusions still hold for the new launch areas? This question is covered in this report.

How can the Night-wolves be defeated? Is also a question I will leave for the Americans to answer.

The Night Wolves: Putin’s motor biking militia of Luhansk.

Color struck: America’s White Jesus Is A Global Export And false Product

Article By Wesley Muhammad, PhD.

What color was Jesus? Most American Christians—Black and White—would dismiss this question as both irrelevant and unanswerable as the Gospels fail to give us a physical description. The irony is that most of these same Americans in their heart of hearts are pretty confident any way that they know what color Jesus was. They attend churches with images of a tall, long haired, full bearded White man depicted in stained glass windows or painted on walls, and they return home to the same depictions framed in their living room or illustrating their family Bibles.

Further compounding the irony is the fact that America actually has an obsession with the (presumed) color of Christ and has exported her White Americanized Savior around the world, as recently documented by Edward J. Blum and Paul Harvey in their book, The Color of Christ: The Son of God and the Saga of Race in America (2012).

In fact, the world’s most popular and recognizable image of Christ is a distinctly 19th-20th century American creation. It is true that versions of the “White Christ” appear in European art as early as the 4th century of the Christian era, but these images coexisted with other, nonwhite representations throughout European history. The popularity of the cult of the Black Madonna and Black Christ throughout Europe is evidence of the fact that the European ‘White Christs’ never acquired the authority and authenticity that the White Christ now has globally. This Christ and his authority are American phenomena. As a predominantly Protestant nation Early America rejected the imaging of Christ that characterized European Catholicism.

By the mid-19th century, however, in response to American expansion, splintering during the Civil War and subsequent reconstructing, “Whiteness” took on a new significance and a newly- empowered “White Jesus” rose to prominence as the sanctifying symbol of a new national unity and power. As Blum and Harvey observe:

“By wrapping itself with the alleged form of Jesus, whiteness gave itself a holy face … With Jesus as white, Americans could feel that sacred whiteness stretched back in time thousands of years and forward in sacred space to heaven and the second coming … The white Jesus promised a white past, a white present, and a future of white glory.”

As America rose to superpower status in the 20th century she became the world’s leading producer and global exporter of White Jesus imagery through film, art, American business, and Christian missions, and has thereby defined the world’s view of the Son of God. This globally recognizable Jesus is a totally American product. Indeed, he is an American. Warner Sallman’s iconic image of Jesus called Head of Christ (1941) became the most widely reproduced piece of artwork in world history and its depiction the most recognizable face of Jesus in the world.

By the 1990’s it had been printed over 500 million times and achieved global iconic status. With smooth white skin, long, flowing blondish-brown hair, long beard and blue eyes, this Nordic Christ consciously disguised any hint of Jesus’s Semitic, oriental origin—and departed from the older European depictions. It both shaped and was shaped by emerging American ideas of whiteness. The beloved White Jesus of today’s world was Made in America.

What, then, did Jesus actually look like? Despite the absence of a detailed description of Jesus’s physical appearance in the Gospels (though John the Revelator saw the risen Christ apparently with wooly hair and black feet, Rev. 1:14-15), there are non-biblical evidences that actually allow us to visualize the Son of God from Nazareth.

Revelation 1:14-15 – King James Version (KJV)

14) His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;

15) And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.

The first century Jewish writer Josephus (37-100 AD) penned the earliest non-biblical testimony of Jesus. He reportedly had access to official Roman records on which he based his information and in his work Halosis or the “Capture (of Jerusalem),” written around 72 A.D., Josephus discussed “the human form of Jesus and his wonderful works.” Unfortunately his texts have passed through Christian hands which altered them, removing offensive material. Fortunately, however, Biblical scholar Robert Eisler in a classic 1931 study of Josephus’ Testimony was able to reconstruct the unaltered testimony based on a newly-discovered Old Russian translation that preserved the original Greek text. According to Eisler’s reconstruction, the oldest non-Biblical description of Jesus read as follows:

“At that time also there appeared a certain man of magic power … if it be meet to call him a man, [whose name is Jesus], whom [certain] Greeks call a son of [a] God, but his disciples [call] the true prophet … he was a man of simple appearance, mature age, black-skinned (melagchrous), short growth, three cubits tall, hunchbacked, prognathous (lit. ‘with a long face’ [macroprosopos]), a long nose, eyebrows meeting above the nose … with scanty [curly] hair, but having a line in the middle of the head after the fashion of the Nazaraeans, with an undeveloped beard.”

This short, black-skinned, mature, hunchbacked Jesus with a unibrow, short curly hair and undeveloped beard bears no resemblance to the Jesus Christ taken for granted today by most of the Christian world: the tall, long haired, long bearded, white-skinned and blue eyed Son of God. Yet, this earliest textual record matches well the earliest iconographic evidence.

The earliest visual depiction of Jesus is a painting found in 1921 on a wall of the baptismal chamber of the house-church at Dura Europos, Syria and dated around 235 A.D. The Jesus that is “Healing the Paralytic Man” (Mark 2:1-12) is short and dark-skinned with a small curly afro – see below.

This description has now been supported by the new science of forensic anthropology. In 2002 British forensic scientists and Israeli archaeologists reconstructed what they believe is the most accurate image of Jesus based off of data obtained from the multi-disciplinary approach. In December 2002 Popular Science Magazine published a cover story on the findings which confirm that Jesus would have been short, around 5”1’, hair “short with tight curls,” a weather-beaten face “which would have made him appear older,” dark eyes and complexion: “he probably looked a great deal more like a dark-skinned Semite than Westerners are used to seeing,” they concluded. The textual, visual, and scientific evidence agrees, then: Jesus likely was a short, dark-skinned Semite with short curly hair and dark eyes.

Colossians 1:15 describes Christ as the “image of the unseen God” and in the Gospel of John (12:45; 14:9) Jesus declares that whoever sees him has seen God. What Jesus “looks like” then is not irrelevant as it is in some way a pointer to God Himself.