THE HISTORICAL ROLE OF BELGIUM IN AFRICA’S EBOLA EPIDEMIC

VICTIM 3The pain of when Ebola takes your loved one away

ARTICLE BY DUTCH MICRO-SURGEON AND SCIENTIST JOHAN VAN DONGEN

During the speech of Belgium Deputy Prime Minister, Alexander De Croo, at the conference of; “Ebola: from Emergency to Recovery”, on March 3, 2015, he overlooked the audience. Amongst them was Her Majesty Queen Mathilde, and as usual, he started with:

“Majesty, your interest to the broader field of development cooperation and humanitarian aid is commonly known. Right from the beginning of the current Ebola crisis you devoted your high attention to it and provided us all with your support. Your presence here today is yet again exemplary of your personal attention to this crisis.”

Was De Croo trying to hide something or because there were many celebrities, including the queen at the conference? Because De Croo failed to mention the role of Hillary Koprowski and Belgium nurses and doctors who deliberately sprayed contaminated vaccine into the mouths of the poor and innocent Congolese, which later gave birth to Ebola and other deadly diseases.

The one who really should attend this conference wasn’t there, so, De Croo has to state “I would also like to apologize, Prime Minister Charles Michel for not being able to make it today. As you probably know, in a previous life the Prime Minister has served as Minister for Development Cooperation and has a special interest in the fight against Ebola. He has requested me to speak on his behalf.”

That was a pity because Michel should have known the date of scientific literature of the criminal pharmaceutical, medical and corrupt (African) politicians, who also knew Aids and Ebola were man-made diseases, just as the Western World, Russia and Japan, and two top Belgium scientists, Guido van der Groen and Peter Piot knew of the medical crimes.

Other attendants at the conference who did listen to the hollow words of De Croo were the Presidents of Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea as well as the President of Congo-Brazzaville, the Prime Minister of Togo and High Representative Mogherini, European Union, for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. To the participants of the conference,  De Croo tried to explain how good Belgium is for the African course, but these celebrities should have known better.

Belgium Deputy Prime Minister, Alexander De Croo’s speech. 

“Your Majesty, Ladies, and Gentlemen. It is now almost 40 years ago since the so-called Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) was discovered. We speak of 1976 and it was a young and devoted Belgian doctor, Peter Piot, who identified the virus in the village of Yambuku, in today’s Democratic Republic of Congo.

Four decades have passed since then and the Ebola virus has struck communities on various occasions, each time in a harsh and cruel way. These epidemics somehow always ended after a few months of time and did not seem to result in a real systemic crisis. Or at least, this is how the international community had perceived it up until last year.

2014 became the year of the global wake-up call. Most probably it was a two-year-old boy in the town of Guéckédou, in Guinea, who was the first victim of the current ebola epidemic. He already died in 2013, on December 6th to be more precisely.Things went very fast then and it was the organization Médecins Sans Frontières who first sounded the alarm. Being active in the field and on ebola since many years, they had never seen an outbreak of the virus with such dimensions.

In August last year, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared it as a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern”. By mid-February 2015, 9.365 deaths were counted and 23.218 cases were registered in West-Africa. By the turn of the year, the efforts of the so many courageous local and international health workers seemed to result in success. But we again start to receive alarming figures; in the week up to February 22nd, the WHO reported 99 new confirmed cases.”

But during the African Ebola crisis, the only thing Belgium really did was to let the Council of Ministers  approved the deployment of a mobile laboratory in Guinea to fight the spread of the Ebola epidemic. The government of France received the expected guarantees for the safety of the Belgian team.

The ministers Didier Reynders, Alexander De Croo, Steven Vandeput and Jan Jambon have to B-FAST given permission to facilitate the deployment of the mobile laboratory. B-FAST has expertise in the field of coordination of development assistance (B-FAST is the rapid intervention structure of the Belgian government. It provides emergency aid during disasters abroad, at the request of the foreign government).

Belgium History About The So-Called First Ebola Outbreak in 1976.

Once in 1976, a research team had been formed, including a special Belgian Aids researcher, to meet at the Antwerp Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine. To their surprise, they didn’t find only members of the American National Institute of Health but also many others, including the director of the American National Institute of Allergy and Infection Diseases NIAID, and surprisingly the director Peter Piot of the Prince Leopold Institute itself.

The highly experienced doctors at the American Center for Disease Control had enrolled an unfamiliar epidemiologist from Johns Hopkins Hospital, who told them exactly how the investigation in Zaire should be given. The plan is to hide the result of the investigation from the public as a medical crime. The outcome of the research remained a mystery because the results are never published.

Moreover, it is quite surprising that since it is known that the Belgian Congo, now Zaire, in this period was plagued by the ‘skinny or slim disease,’ synonymous with Aids, and that the disease was associated with fatal infections found in black American and African men. Equally remarkable is that several Belgian researchers published on Aids and opportunistic infections in Zaire after the American researcher Robert Gallo had made it official that the Aids disease was caused by the new virus HTLV.

Even though blood samples of the deceased Zairians were stored in the Belgian research laboratories of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Plant since from the seventies, obviously, no one was interested  to find out what killed them, because they know. Maybe the Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine was afraid to make the issues of Jonas Salk, Alfred Bruce Sabin and Hillary Koprowski open before the declaration of Robert Gallo.

The Role Of Belgium Professor Guido van der Groen

Professor Guido van der Groen is the former head of the virology department at the institute for tropical medicine in Antwerp. In 1976, together with his colleague Peter Piot, he identified the Ebolavirus for the first time. The virus was discovered by investigating blood samples of a deceased Belgium nurse, who was stationed at a mission in Zaire (the former name of the Democratic Republic of the Congo). Her colleagues were puzzled by her death since they couldn’t identify the cause. Therefore, they asked if the institute of tropical medicine could perhaps identify why she died.

What followed was an intense investigation, where ultimately the cause was found: The Ebolavirus seemed a variant of the filovirus. For additional research on the origin and to restrict the epidemic of this virus, Guido van der Groen personally went to one of the affected villages in Zaire, where the outbreak was responsible for 280 deaths.

Professor van der Groen stayed in Zaire for three months, where he became particularly interested in the virus, but also in other hemorrhagic fever viruses (VHF’s). Furthermore, he was implicated in developing simple means to diagnose VHF’s. During his travels, he noticed the harrowing health care problems in developing countries.

Besides researching the Ebolavirus, Guido van de Groen has contributed a great deal in the research of the Aids virus. For his work regarding the Aids virus, Van der Groen received an Award from the Social Youth Action, an organization dedicated to the fight against HIV/AIDS in Belgium and developing countries. The now retired professor has, with an impressive number of 269 published articles, made a great contribution to virology.

The question is why De Croo didn’t speak of Van der Groen? Was it because he has said earlier that Ebola was a man-made disease in a USA laboratory for Bio-warfare purposes? To remind you of what De Croo said: “We speak of 1976 and it was a young and devoted Belgian doctor, Peter Piot, who identified the virus in the village of Yambuku, in today’s Democratic Republic of Congo.”

But to our knowledge in 1976, both Guido van der Groen together with his colleague Peter Piot identified the Ebolavirus for the first time.  But why did Ge Croo wouldn’t like to mention Groene’s name? Were they angry with him for saying that Ebola was laboratory engineered by America as bio-weapon?

Again, tirelessly, Johan van Dongen and Joel Savage have taken African leaders incompetency into consideration, to ask them the reason they sit on the presidential seats, living in corruption by taking Africa’s money to Swiss Banks, while Europe and America used Africans as Guinea pigs, to test all the dangerous drugs manufactured in Europe and America.

Mouth 3The beginning of Belgium’s Ebola crime in Africa.

If De Croo is scared to speak the truth  then: Micro-surgeon Johan van Dongen is not scared to say that “The Ebola virus was man-made and tested on Africans in Uganda and Zaire, under the  guidance of Belgium medics, in order to find vaccines against it for military defending purposes. After the Ebola outbreaks in Africa, apparently, nobody is interested in finding a cure for Africa.”

On October 13, 1994, in an interview with Humo, one of Belgium’s news magazines, Belgium’s professor Guido van der Groen said  “The U.S. military laboratories slated for Ebola and HIV, to develop into a biological weapon in the early sixties. Because he regretted of revealing the truth, Groen now claims that: Ebola was invented in 1960’s in Fort Detrick and in Congo. Humo has archive copies of all their magazines. Anyone who doubts this article should contact Humo publishers.

Certainly, out of the blues, after the Ghanaian investigative journalist Joel Savage, went to the notorious Stuivenberg Hospital in Antwerp, to investigate the unprecedented high death rate of Africans, dying in mysterious circumstances and published the truth in his book “Little Boygium-Wonderful Experience, now it appears he is a subject of ridicule, scorn, and laughter in Antwerp, just reminding me of the problems I passed through after revealing that Aids and Ebola were indeed medical crimes against Africans.

For over eight years, Joel Savage was the only black man in Belgium who had a press card as a journalist later joined by another black radio journalist. Many Belgians asked Joel how managed to get his press card. This is typically another role of Belgium in Africa’s Ebola crisis.

Many Africans with journalism experience who couldn’t stand the discrimination and Apartheid system of work choice in Belgium, migrated to England soon as they had their Belgium passports. But Joel Savage decided to stay and fight the (Royal) establishment who doesn’t dare to speak at the conference of; “Ebola: from Emergency to Recovery,” attended by Her Majesty Queen Mathilde, who couldn’t say that Aids and Ebola were medical crimes against Africa and that Belgium played a significant role.

Belgium is actively fighting against terrorism and the criminals involved, after the Brussels’ airport and Metro stations attacks. But the Royal family supports crime. In Brussels stands a statue of Leopold II, a king who killed over ten million Africans, including women and children. I feel ashamed to be a White man sometimes. If the Belgium Royal family is not supporting crime, then they should demolish that stupid statue.

The Writer

johan-10Johan Van Dongen is a Dutch Microsurgeon and scientist. After forty years of research found out that Aids, Ebola, Lassa fever and other deadly diseases were all man-made and used on Africans as bio-weapons. When he published his research in the Netherlands, the Dutch Government was furious, branding him a whistleblower. He lost his job as a lecturer at the University of Maastricht, Holland.

There is no truth in this world, the reason people like Johan Van Dongen suffered for the truth. But he is a happy man because lies and wickedness will prevail, but only for a short period. The chicken will always come home to roost.

Ebola: The Japanese Cult Aum Shinrikyo’s Attempt To Use The Virus As A Potential Biological Weapon

Aum Shinrikyo’s leader Shoko Asahara

By Scientist/Micro-Surgeon Johan Van Dongen

The Japanese cult Aum Shinrikyo, infamous for setting off sarin gas in a Tokyo subway in 1995, also targeted Ebola as a potential biological weapon. In 1992, they sent a medical group of 40 people ostensibly to provide aid, during an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo. However, their real intention was to collect some Ebola virus, as Amy Smithson, a senior fellow at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, noted in her 2000 report Ataxia.

Even if Aum Shinrikyo had managed to gather samples of the Ebola virus, it would have been extremely difficult to kill large numbers of people in countries with a strong health infrastructure such as Japan. Once the virus had been identified and patients isolated, the pathogen would have been unlikely to spread widely. Still, any terrorist attempting to stoke fears rather than accrue a high body count could have some modicum of success with Ebola. “When talking about bioterror, it’s more about the terror than it is the bio,” said Fauci.

Doctor Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (one of the US National Institutes of Health) stated in an interview that the virus could potentially be used for “small-scale” Ebola attacks, in about three different ways, although each approach would run up against substantial logistical, financial and biological barriers. First, Ebola could be weaponized by taking large quantities of it and inserting them into a small “bomblet” that, once detonated, would spray the virus perhaps 30 feet potentially infecting people as it landed on their faces, on cuts or on hands that they might then touch their eyes with.

In this photo provided by CBS News, the National Institute of Health's Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert, speaks on CBS's "Face the Nation" in Washington. Speaking on the Ebola virus, Fauci said it's perfectly normal to feel anxious about a disease that kills so fast and is ravaging parts of West Africa, but predicts there won't be an outbreak in the U.S. (AP Photo/CBS News, Chris Usher)

Doctor Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (one of the US National Institutes of Health)

“That would be like a hundred people simultaneously touching an Ebola-infected person,” says Fauci. Ebola would not need to be altered in any way to make such a plot work. The virus is already so capable of spreading from person to person via contact with bodily fluids that in its natural state it could do some serious damage.

“Ebola is a very lethal pathogenic virus,” says virologist Robert Garry of Tulane University. “It’s basically weaponizing itself.”

The second, and perhaps easiest, small-scale bioterrorism option would be to recruit individuals for Ebola suicide missions. Such a plan would hinge on injecting Ebola virus into a limited number of people, who would then need to leave west Africa (or wherever the outbreak may be) before becoming symptomatic. Then those individuals would have to get into a public space and projectile vomit or bleed onto others to infect them. Obviously, the plot would need to overcome substantial technical challenges including the extreme weakness that arises from Ebola. If it did succeed, this mode of transmission would not kill thousands of people, but it would set off significant fears.

The third bio-terrorism method appears to be the most unlikely: genetically modifying the virus to enable it to spread more readily, perhaps through the air. As Scientific American reported on September 16, transforming the Ebola virus from a pathogen that primarily affects the circulatory system to one well suited for the respiratory system, would be a major research undertaking. While theoretically the microbe could be manipulated to act in that way, it would be a demanding choice for nefarious actors looking to stockpile harmful materials.

Johan van Dongen

But there’s another delivery mechanism that’s more up a suicide bomber’s alley. They get infected and carry the disease incubating in them but still asymptomatic to their target country. As soon as the symptoms just begin manifesting, the person goes to a highly public area and blows themselves up, spraying contaminated and aerosolized body components all over the surrounding populace, as well as killing or injuring others just from the blast.

That can be done during the cold and flu season when everyone is coughing and sneezing already and you have a prime secondary and tertiary infection path already going in your favor, as well as masking the early Ebola symptoms.

Glenn Ogoro

If we consider Ebola as a weapon of terror, then yes; it’s not likely. How about considering Ebola as a means to combat terrorism? After all, Ebola has all the spread characteristics which can be used to eliminate or weaken hostile or terrorist cells.

First, most terrorist cells now are of Muslim origin and maintain religious and cultural practices which include touching, kissing and washing of their dead. Since these cells by their nature are communal, there is a lot of targeted interaction between members of a cell, even when they are sick.

A simple prisoner exchange could be the link to introducing the virus into these extremist groups/cells. A few infected prisoners injected and left to harbor the virus for a few days right before release is an easy way to get the virus in these cells. New prisoners are usually the center of attention for a few days and constantly greeted with hugs, kisses, and other affectionate contact gestures. Spread.

When said prisoner gets ill; until there are the later signs of hemorrhaging, the virus can easily spread to internal and general caretakers, which I can assume will be a few, and from them to others. Multiplied spread.

Further spread will increase when the body is being prepared for burial (washing, kissing). Spread cycle.

Until the signs are noted by members of terrorist groups, the virus can easily spread rapidly and fast; engulfing a network in a matter of weeks. Even though the spread from one prisoner might not be that much, the impact will be major if considered through a group of released prisoners (as usual).

Early containment could be unlikely, due to the general opposition of western doctrines in these cycles. The forcing of extremist groups to change their practices could mean undermining their religious beliefs and accepting a “western” way, which may not be easily accepted.

In the event where the virus is detected early among members, the effects of panic and fear among a typically close-knit operation can still be deleterious, to the point of slowing or shutting down operations due to reduced interaction, and uncertainty among members.

Biowarfare has been going on for a very long time. In the dark ages, plague victims would be thrown into cities by catapult to break sieges. Smallpox infected blankets were given to Indians by British soldiers in the French and Indian Wars. China still has outbreaks from bio-weapons the Japanese used against them in WWII.

It wouldn’t take a Manhattan Project type effort to develop a bio-weapon and Ebola is so nasty to start with, it doesn’t need much in the way of weaponization. If someone is playing games, field testing this bug and getting their act together for a major attack somewhere in the world, it’s time to build a bunker.

Multiple viral agents have been classified by the CDC as potential weapons of mass destruction or agents for biologic terrorism. Agents such as smallpox, viral hemorrhagic fever viruses, agents of viral encephalitis, and others are of concern because they are highly infectious and relatively easy to produce. Although dispersion might be difficult, the risk is magnified by the fact that large populations are susceptible to these agents and only limited treatment and vaccination strategies exist. Although the risk of large-scale bioterrorism using viral agents is small, public health programs and health care providers must be prepared for this potentially devastating impact on public health.

The filoviruses, Marburg and Ebola, are classified as Category A bio-warfare agents by the Centers for Disease Control. Most known human infections with these viruses have been fatal, and no vaccines or effective therapies are currently available. Filoviruses are highly infectious by the airborne route in the laboratory, but investigations of African outbreaks have shown that person-to-person spread requires direct contact with the virus-containing material. To show you that Ebola can be spread by air and other directions we will publish three scientific Abstracts published in well known scientific institutions.

Lethal experimental infections of rhesus monkeys by aerosolized Ebola virus

Johnson E1, Jaax N, White J, Jahrling P, Int J Exp Pathol. 1995 Aug;76(4):227-36.

Abstract

The potential of atherogenic infection by Ebola virus was established by using a head-only exposure aerosol system. Virus-containing droplets of 0.8-1.2 microns were generated and administered into the respiratory tract of rhesus monkeys via inhalation. Inhalation of viral doses as low as 400 plaque-forming units of virus caused a rapidly fatal disease in 4-5 days.

The illness was clinically identical to that reported for parenteral virus inoculation, except for the occurrence of subcutaneous and venipuncture site bleeding and serosanguineous nasal discharge. Immunocytochemistry revealed cell-associated Ebola virus antigens present in airway epithelium, alveolar pneumocytes, and macrophages in the lung and pulmonary lymph nodes; extracellular antigen was present on mucosal surfaces of the nose, oropharynx, and airways.

Aggregates of the characteristic filamentous virus were present of type I pneumocytes, macrophages, and air spaces of the lung by electron microscopy. Demonstration of fatal aerosol transmission of this virus in monkeys reinforces the importance of taking appropriate precautions to prevent its potential aerosol transmission to humans.

Transmission of Ebola virus (Zaire strain) to uninfected control monkeys in a biocontainment laboratory

Jaax N1, Jahrling P, Geisbert T, Geisbert J, Teele K, McKee K, Nagley D, Johnson E, Jaax G, Peters CLancet. 1995 Dec 23-30;346(8991-8992):1669-71.

Abstract

Secondary transmission of Ebola virus infection in humans is known to be caused by direct contact with infected patients or body fluids. We report transmission of Ebola virus (Zaire strain) to two of three control rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) that did not have direct contact with experimentally inoculated monkeys held in the same room.

The two control monkeys died from Ebola virus infections at 10 and 11 days after the last experimentally inoculated monkey had died. The most likely route of infection of the control monkeys was aerosol, oral or conjunctival exposure to virus-laden droplets secreted or excreted from the experimentally inoculated monkeys. These observations suggest approaches to the study of routes of transmission to and among humans.

Lethal experimental infection of rhesus monkeys with Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga) virus by the oral and conjunctival route of exposure.

Davis K.J, Geisbert TJ, Vogel P, Jaax GP, Topper M,J ahrling PB. Lancet 1996 Feb; 120 (2): 140-55.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The source of infection or mode of transmission of Ebola virus to human index cases of Ebola fever has not been established. Field observations in outbreaks of Ebola fever indicate that secondary transmission of Ebola virus is linked to improper needle hygiene, direct contact with infected tissue or fluid samples, and close contact with infected patients.

While it is presumed that the virus infects through either break in the skin or contact with mucous membranes, the only two routes of exposure that have been experimentally validated are parental inoculation and aerosol inhalation. Epidemiologist evidence suggests that aerosol exposure is not an important means of virus transmission in natural outbreaks of human Ebola fever; this study was designed to verify that Ebola virus could be effectively transmitted by oral or conjunctival exposure in nonhuman primates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were exposed to Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga) virus orally (N=4), conjunctival (N=4), or by intramuscular inoculation (N=1, virus-positive control).

RESULTS

Four of seven monkeys exposed by the conjunctival route, three of four monkeys exposed by the oral route, and the intramuscularly inoculated positive control monkey were successfully infected with Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga). Seven monkeys died of Ebola fever between days 7 and 8 post-exposure, but one of the monkeys given aggressive supportive therapy and a platelet transfusion; lived until day 12 post-exposure.

Belgian scientist and discoverer of Ebola, Peter Piot, knew everything about the virus but wouldn’t say publicly was a medical crime against Africa, because his country was involved.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the experimental study confirm that Ebola virus can be effectively transmitted via the oral or conjunctival route of exposure in nonhuman primates and absolutely can be used as a bio-warfare weapon.

The development Of Ebola Laboratory By Hitler’s Vassals In USA, Russia, Germany, Belgium And The Philippines.

Marburg 2

By Johan Van Dongen and Joel Savage

Western journalists, soldiers, politicians, as well as scientists, now over more than a decade after the second millennium, should realize what exactly took place in the last two hundred years on the African continent. Africa is used as a dumping ground for drugs, testing of drugs, exposing people to bio-warfare products and deliveries of war material to the wrong regimes, which have adversely affected the continent as well.

Actually you could say that the rest of the world have seriously abused Africa and degraded its people, as if they are creatures walking around on earth without brains, yet Africans are in the same products of Quantum Physics and Quantum Mechanics realized as whites, so I don’t understand why the many white leaders have taken advantage to treat blacks unfairly?

The aforementioned establishments should know what actually took place on the continent of Africa and therefore should also be aware of the fact that the United States Of  America, that claim ‘In God We Trust’  turned against God and became a land which supported Hitler’s evil and Nazi war criminals.

The shocking story of how America became one of the world’s safest postwar havens for Nazis, has revealed in Eric Lichtblau’s remarkable book: “The Nazis Next door. How America becomes a safe haven for Hitler’s men.”

Thousands of Nazis from concentration camps, guards to high-level officers in the Third Reich and other Nazi criminals, came to the United States after World War II and settled quietly to begin a new life. They had little trouble getting in, with scant scrutiny, many gained entry on their own as self-styled war “refugees,” avoiding the detection of their criminal history and their war crimes soon forgotten. But some had help and protection from the U.S. government.

The CIA, FBI, and the military, gave support to Hitler’s minions to work as spies, intelligence assets, and leading scientists and engineers, whitewashing their histories.

In the United States of America, the Nazi war criminals collaborated with top American scientists, to manufacture viruses of deadly diseases, financed by the CIA, the Rockefeller Foundation and their counterparts the Rothschilds, thus; Ebola and Aids viruses were some of the engineered diseases and spread by the Germans and Americans.

The same Nazi war criminals became normal American citizens, while years after the Second World War, the Jews captured in war concentration camps, were still going through the cruelties of life.  In America, the Nazi criminals taught students and they found out the way of making deadly viruses in animals. Financed by Bill Gates, vaccines were contaminated with the deadly viruses to be inflicted on Africans.

All the manufactured viruses, such as the Ebola virus got their names according to how they were prepared in the concerned laboratory or how it originated. But can someone for a moment think of and ask the reason Aids and Ebola have killed thousands of Africans.

*In 1989, the CDC reports, Ebola-Reston virus was introduced into quarantine facilities in Virginia and Pennsylvania by monkeys imported from the Philippines. No humans were infected.

*In 1990, Ebola-Reston virus was introduced once again into quarantine facilities in Virginia and Texas by monkeys imported from the Philippines. Four humans developed antibodies but did not get sick.

*In 1996, Ebola-Reston virus was introduced into a quarantine facility in Texas by monkeys imported from the Philippines. No human infections were identified.

*In May of 2004, a Russian scientist died of Ebola after accidentally pricking herself with a syringe while conducting research on infected guinea pigs in Siberia.

*A similar accident with Ebola had reportedly occurred several months earlier at the US Army’s biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md., but the researcher involved didn’t acquire the disease. This incident is not listed on the CDC’s list of confirmed outbreaks, perhaps because the researcher didn’t develop antibodies.

In 2009, a scientist in Berlin, Germany accidentally pricked herself and was infected with Ebola. She was given an experimental vaccine as part of her treatment and did not become ill.

And only accidentally somebody dies because of a stupid accident. And what about all those students who are writing scientific papers and abstracts, as three of them are depicted, published in top medical journals in the last seventy years! Because Aids and Ebola viruses were man-made long before their outbreaks in black communities in Africa.

Lethal experimental infections of rhesus monkeys by aerosolized Ebola virus

Johnson E1, Jaax N, White J, Jahrling P,

Int J Exp Pathol. 1995 Aug;76(4):227-36.

Abstract

The potential of aerogenic infection by Ebola virus was established by using a head-only exposure aerosol system. Virus-containing droplets of 0.8-1.2 microns were generated and administered into the respiratory tract of rhesus monkeys via inhalation. Inhalation of viral doses as low as 400 plaque-forming units of virus caused a rapidly fatal disease in 4-5 days.

The illness was clinically identical to that reported for parenteral virus inoculation, except for the occurrence of subcutaneous and venipuncture site bleeding and serosanguineous nasal discharge. Immunocytochemistry revealed cell-associated Ebola virus antigens present in airway epithelium, alveolar pneumocytes, and macrophages in the lung and pulmonary lymph nodes; extracellular antigen was present on mucosal surfaces of the nose, oropharynx, and airways.

Aggregates of the characteristic filamentous virus were present within the type I pneumocytes, macrophages, and air spaces of the lung by electron microscopy. Demonstration of fatal aerosol transmission of this virus in monkeys reinforces the importance of taking appropriate precautions to prevent its potential aerosol transmission to humans.

Transmission of Ebola virus (Zaire strain) to uninfected control monkeys in a biocontainment laboratory

Jaax N1, Jahrling P, Geisbert T, Geisbert J, teele K, McKee K, Nagley D, Johnson E, Jaax G, Peters C.

Lancet. 1995 Dec 23-30;346(8991-8992):1669-71.

Abstract

Secondary transmission of Ebola virus infection in humans is known to be caused by direct contact with infected patients or body fluids. We report transmission of Ebola virus (Zaire strain) to two of three control rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) that did not have direct contact with experimentally inoculated monkeys held in the same room.

The two control monkeys died from Ebola virus infections at 10 and 11 days after the last experimentally inoculated monkey had died. The most likely route of infection of the control monkeys was aerosol, oral or conjunctival exposure to virus-laden droplets secreted or excreted from the experimentally inoculated monkeys. These observations suggest approaches to the study of routes of transmission to and among humans.

Lethal experimental infection of rhesus monkeys with Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga) virus by the oral and conjunctival route of exposure

Davis K.J, Geisbert TJ, Vogel P, Jaax GP, Topper M, Jahrling PB.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Feb;120(2):140-55.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The source of infection or mode of transmission of Ebola virus to human index cases of Ebola fever has not been established. Field observations in outbreaks of Ebola fever indicate that secondary transmission of Ebola virus is linked to improper needle hygiene, direct contact with infected tissue or fluid samples, and close contact with infected patients.

While it is presumed that the virus infects through either break in the skin or contact with mucous membranes, the only two routes of exposure that have been experimentally validated are parenteral inoculation and aerosol inhalation. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that aerosol exposure is not an important means of virus transmission in natural outbreaks of human Ebola fever; this study was designed to verify that Ebola virus could be effectively transmitted by oral or conjunctival exposure in nonhuman primates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were exposed to Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga) virus orally (N=4), conjunctively (N=4), or by intramuscular inoculation (N=1, virus-positive control).

RESULTS

Four of seven monkeys exposed by the conjunctival route, three of four monkeys exposed by the oral route, and the intramuscularly inoculated positive control monkey were successfully infected with Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga). Seven monkeys died of Ebola fever between days 7 and 8 post-exposure, but one of the monkeys given aggressive supportive therapy and a platelet transfusion; lived until day 12 post-exposure.

Marburg

Belgian scientist and discoverer of Ebola, Peter Piot, knew everything about the virus but wouldn’t say publicly was a medical crime against Africa, because his country was involved.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the experiment study confirm that Ebola virus can be effectively transmitted via the oral or conjunctival route of exposure in nonhuman primates.

Well, Nazi students prepared many dangerous viruses, thus; everyone blames them for the crimes they committed, but the real question is: Who discovered officially those devilish and deadly viruses? It was a Belgian scientist named Peter Piot!

Peter Piot

Nearly 40 years ago, a young Belgian scientist traveled to a remote part of the Congolese rainforest – his task was to help find out why so many people were dying from an unknown and terrifying disease. In September 1976, a package containing a shiny blue thermos flask arrived at the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, Belgium.

Working in the lab that day was Peter Piot, a 27-year-old scientist and medical school graduate training as a clinical microbiologist. “It was just a normal flask like any other you would use to keep coffee warm,” recalls Piot, now Director of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. But this thermos wasn’t carrying coffee – altogether inside was a different cargo.

Nestled among a few melting ice cubes were vials of blood along with a note. It was a Belgian doctor based in what was then Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of Congo – his handwritten message explained that the blood was that of a nun, also from Belgium, who had fallen ill with a mysterious illness which he couldn’t identify.

The samples were treated like others, lab tested, but when the scientists placed some of the cells under an electron microscope they saw something they didn’t expect. “We saw a gigantic worm-like structure – gigantic by viral standards,” says Piot. It was a very unusual shape for a virus, only one other virus looked like that of the Marburg virus.” The Marburg virus was first discovered in 1967 when 31 people became ill with hemorrhagic fever in the cities of Marburg and Frankfurt in Germany and in Belgrade, the capital of Yugoslavia.

This Marburg outbreak was associated with laboratory staffs who were working with infected monkeys imported from Uganda – seven people died. Piot knew how serious Marburg could be – but after consulting experts around the world, he got confirmation that what he was seeing under the microscope wasn’t Marburg, but different which hasn’t been seen before. After that what’s next?Marburg