Black History: Once Upon A Time In America

Years after slavery, African-Americans are still struggling to be real Americans

Elizabeth Ann Eckford, a student, and a key figure at the Little Rock Central High School is pictured being followed, booed and yelled at by a mob of whites. She was among the group of the nine African-American students famous for having desegregated the school in 1957. A closer look at the lady on the right, you can see the chilling, unreasonable dislike in her eyes. This reflects on the history of Apartheid Education in America.

In the deep sea, the big fish has no sympathy for the helpless small fish. They intimidate the small ones and always try to eat them up. That was once the hostile situation in America years back, in every sector, including the educational sector, against African-Americans. 

It’s very embarrassing to see such images in America, a country that  believes in democracy, above all they say: In God We Trust.

The more disturbing factor is, America provided  a “safe haven” in the United States for Nazis criminals and their collaborators after World War II, yet subjected African-Americans to abuse, discrimination, lynching, experimentation, and slavery.

Abolition of slavery is a fact recorded in history, but the reality is, it still exists in many places around the globe, including America today because we live in a violent and corrupt society.

How many years now did America start fighting against an illegal drug entering its sovereignty? Because of corruption, the country is plagued by cocaine and other dangerous drugs, drastically taking its toll on many citizens.

There was a time, if you are an honest hard worker, with distinguished achievements in the society, you will be awarded, but now those who commit serious crimes against humanity are those that receive that awards, including the Nobel Prize. Among the ring of liars, if you want to remain different and live in truth, you will eventually become an enemy.

Do you feel this world is okay? Are you happy about the turmoil and the path of doom the world has taken? Why politicians fighting for power when they don’t have any means to save this world? Nothing in this world seems to be going better or doing well. Everything has taken the wrong path.

Whether Africans were used as Guinea pigs in testing drugs, whether Aids, Ebola, Lassa and other deadly diseases, were bio-weapons against Africans to depopulate the continent, or whether African-Americans were used for experimentation, the Black man has survived today. That power wasn’t strong enough to wipe out the black race.

Black history is a sad song and a rough road. Even though it’s like an image hanging on the wall, the Black man should change that sad song to a happy song and straighten up that rough road ahead of him. We should let go hatred, jealousy, racism, racial discrimination and hypocrisy to embrace love in our community.

“Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails.” —I Corinthians 13:4-8a.

Donald Trump: Why Aren’t You Killed Like Jeffrey Bradstreet Or Other Opponents Of Vaccinations Which Not Only Cause Autism But Also Aids And Ebola?

Donald

Donald Trump

This article is dedicated to Jeffrey Bradstreet: By Johan Van Dongen

The above question is raised by me and many others, because recently in the United States of America, over seven doctors have been murdered or found dead in strange circumstances. I find it very necessary to ask Donald Trump this question, because of the statement he made that: “Vaccines Do Cause Autism.” and also to find an answer to why the disappearance from the medical scene or mysterious deaths of alternative health doctors who have real cures, but opposed and disapproved by the FDA?

When I saw the interview of Dr. Jeff Bradstreet, nothing shows a possible suicide as mentioned by US governmental institutions. During this interview, Bradstreet showed his engagement, for he was not a person who would give up easily. It was a very optimistic person with a normal attitude. He was laughing, joking and celebrating because his autistic son just graduated from high-school.
The supposed reason for his “suicide” – an FDA raid on his clinic – is nothing new for him. There was nothing new in his life that would have been a reason for him to want to end his own life, only new things that would encourage him to live his life and perhaps encourage others that want to take their lives. Now we have to wait and see what happens to Donald Trump.

The overall conclusion

“Dr. Jeffrey Bradstreet has been under attack by big pharma for his success during all his professional life, so there is no way he would have committed suicide for just another attack. He was murdered; the FDA were clearly involved, and the other suspect is the MMR vaccine corporations, who work with the FDA. Dr. Bradstreet loudly published the fact we all know: The MMR jab, which makes billions of profit, causes autism.”

It isn’t only autism which is caused by vaccines but also Aids and Ebola. For decades Africa is used as a bio-warfare laboratory of German and Japanese war criminals under the guidance of the USA because they protect these Nazi bastards. This makes the USA the land of evil, so once Donald Trump becomes president of the United States, there is a lot work to do by replacing black prisoners with white pharmaceutical criminals in three piece suits.

The horrific Aids pandemic tremendously has generated scientific controversies within and outside the scientific establishment. Only a minority of scientists and other engaged people have access to inside information concerning (bio-warfare) Aids and Ebola research.

As an experimental micro-surgeon in the early seventies, almost at the beginning of the multiple organ transplantation eras, I have carried out thousands of experimental organ transplantations. In order to deal with organ rejection, I administered, radiation and sera for diminishing the immunity of the organ receiver. Besides that, I also administered uncountable agents to recipients of organs in order to trigger, diminish or completely wipe out the immune capacity which can be compared with Aids.

During my university and hospital appointments in the early seventies, and later undercover in the pharmaceutical industry, I discovered at that time that animals didn’t die because of rejection of the transplanted organ but because of multiple infections which can be compared with human Aids victims. So, I noticed that Aids can be induced by radiation, aflatoxins, Immuran/prednisolone combination, anti-lymphocyte sera and many other bio-warfare agents.

Dormant HIV virus

As head of the Department of Experimental Microsurgery, and involved in all transplantation and immunological experiments, I also have been involved in many controversies. Especially the connection of my work and the polemic concerning the transmission of HIV in many ways. I discovered not only in experiments but also in the extensive scientific literature the role of an obligatory co-factor that trans-activates the “Dormant” virus HIV in specific human cells.

This obligatory co-factor which trans-activates the “Dormant” virus in specific human cells are deliberately introduced into mostly black-skinned African people, governed by massive environmental factors as you can read in our book: “Aids and Ebola the greatest crime in medical history against mankind,” in order to depopulate Africa and other parts of the world.

This article is to enlighten readers about the real origin of Aids and the true nature of famous international researchers as Robert Gallo. As far as Gallo is concerned, Ricardo Veronesi, professor of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Sao Paulo, was personally informed about the true nature of Gallo’s research long before this controversy turned into a public scandal and as a consequence thousands of scientific Aids dissidents.

It was no less than Francoise Barré-Sinoussi of the French Pasteur Institute who revealed the criminal intention of Gallo. Not only she became an Aids dissident? but also the discoverer of the HIV virus Luc Montagnier disputed Gallo, the fake discoverer of the HIV virus.

In their opinion, the major bursts in the common scientific approach of lies in its ignoring that the pathogenicity of the HIV indeed is governed by multiple deliberate environmental factors and one of these determinant factors are the PCR test (Polymerase Chain Reaction Test).

Using and extrapolation of these kinds of techniques we can conclude that people who have HIV in their bodies, were purposely infected with this virus which can lead to Aids. Bio-warfare scientists are able to make black-skinned people ‘Africans) artificially susceptible for HIV or Ebola by using controllable diseases as a cover-up.

Most of the biowarfare research using viruses which cause Aids and Ebola is predominantly carried out in Germany and Japan until 1945 and since then mainly in the USA and France, using Nazi and Japanese (military) scientific war criminals.

Autism/Aids/HIV Theory Dissidents Like Jeffrey Bradstreet

The official scientific origin of the diverse HIV-strains has been placed somewhere between 1938 and 1948 when scientist T.F. Smith et al, published an article in the authoritative medical journal Nature, is 1988, captioned: “The phylogenetic history of immunodeficiency virus.”

He wasn’t the only scientists who revealed the true nature of the HIV virus. Smith’s efforts to reveal the real origin of HIV was followed, to name a few, by Sharp et al with his article: “Understanding the origins of Aids viruses,” also in Nature, followed by Meyers et all with: “The phylogenetic analysis of the HIVs.” But the most important article is described in the top of the bill of medical journals the Lancet,  by scientist L.A. Evans et al who discovered the; “Simultaneous isolation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 from an Aids patient”.

All these mentioned scientists agreed that the distribution of the HIV virus was an intentional action. Their findings make it very conceivable that this distribution was intentional, because sometimes both the new viruses HIV-1 and HIV-2, respectively HTLV-IV, are existing in one and the same person according to Evans. And because his publication is checked by the editing and scientific boards of the Lancet, the outcome of his investigation was true. This counts also for thousands of publications in other medical journals as described in our book “Aids and Ebola the greatest crime in medical history against mankind.”

According to the famous Aids/HIV theory dissident Wolff Geisler, further evidence of the intentional distribution, out of the mentioned simultaneous infection of the same persons, it was described as a second Aids epidemic in the same black-skinned population, by an inefficient transmission of the HIV virus. The appearance of this extreme rare retrovirus among the African Aids patients is so conspicuous that some world famous scientists uttered a sentence about it. They alleged this to be; “Only another acquired opportunistic infection but rather an additional death sentence.” But is it?

In Africa the probability of an early death of HIV patients is three times higher than elsewhere when HIV patients are simultaneously infected with HTLV-1 as described in the Lancet by Page et al in his scientific publication: HTLV-I/II seropositivity and death from Aids among HIV-Seropositiveintravenous drug users (Lancet, 1990; 335: 1439-41), an even more extremely important publication for the Aids/HIV theory dissidents. Because, especially HTLV-I, among many other HIV viruses, was only demonstrated in Uganda, Ghana, South Africa, and Namibia.

Only in these countries, HIV patients appear simultaneously up till now. According to Wolff Geisler, the concomitant existence of HTLV-I and HIV produces the observed rate of Aids patients in Uganda, Kenya and black-skinned people in Florida, USA and some Caribbean Islands, even though in general black people are by nature more resistant against HIV-infection than pale-skinned persons (see below). This means the HIV viruses are genetically engineered as describe in our book.

No less than Luc Montagnier et al, the discoverer of the HIV virus stated that this virus is made out of the Nazi eugenics and  a genetically engineered experiment as well as the development of Aids-causing viruses in horses. In a very talked about an article he described in the authoritative Annals of Virology: “A new type of retrovirus from patients presenting with lymphadenopathy and acquired immune deficiency syndrome”: Structural and anti-genetic relatedness with Equine Infectious Anemia Virus EIAV (horse Aids), 1984; 135E: 119-31.

Equine Infectious Anemia Virus EIAV (HIV/Horse-Aids) made by Nazi Germany

If we compare these findings to our references in:“Aids the greatest crime in medical history against mankind” the book now available at Amazon, the HLA-A, B, C, DR3 and DR5 loci, is examined by the Nazi’s led by Otmar Verschuer.

In 1956, he joined the American Eugenics Society and worked under auspices of the Rockefeller-fund. He was also head of the Department of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany.

Furthermore, we have to take into account that within people who have blood type HLA-DR3 Aids, it is much less common than in people who have the HLA-DR5 type. Under the Nazi’s research, it is important to note that precisely the HLA-DR5 type occurs mainly in Jews. The HLA-DR3 type contrast is most common in dark-colored Africans.

The two evidence or references are enough to let you know vividly what took place. In general you can say that it is harder for blacks to get Aids than as it is for whites, but blacks have been made susceptible for a broad spectrum of brand new diseases caused by Germans, partly under the auspices of the South African Apartheid regime, and after the war under the guidance of the U.S.A.

Nowadays we now know that monkeys do not get Aids when infected with the human Aids virus. The same goes for tuberculosis until the moment that monkeys in a laboratory made receptive. Therefore black-skinned people are under no circumstances contaminated with Aids by monkeys with or without eating them. That is so to speak a criminal WHO/ CDC / FDA scientific fairy tale.

 

 

San Francisco Medical Research Foundation Claims Aids and Ebola Viruses Were Man-Made

 

Ebola

Ebola is a hidden medical that many countries including Belgium, Holland, and America are involved

By Johan van Dongen and Joel Savage

The continent Africa has faced its worst outbreak of diseases, including Aids and Ebola. One of the many questions which need an answer is: Why is it that the Ebola virus claimed more lives in Africa than any continent? After many investigations and publications, we found the answers, backed by a news release from the San Francisco Medical Research Foundation, an independent institute in America, a country that promoted of Hitler’s evil ideology and accommodated Nazi criminals.

Like Leonard Horowitz and many others, micro-surgeon and investigative scientist Johan van Dongen, came to the conclusion that indeed Aids and Ebola were man-made viruses. Almost at the same time Horowitz’s book: “Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola – Nature, Accident or Genocide?”, and Johan van Dongen’s book in Dutch “Pleidooi door de aap-Pleading for the Ape” were published late in 1996.

After reading many publications about Aids and Ebola and convinced that the two viruses were created as biological weapons against Africa, the Ghanaian-Belgian investigative journalist, Joel Savage, who investigated the high death rate of Africans at the notorious Stuivenberg Hospital in Antwerp, and brought it to an end, agreed to work together to publish the English version of  ‘Pleading for the Ape, naming it ‘Aids and Ebola: The Greatest Medical Crime Against Mankind’ now available at Amazon.com

 THE SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION

Leonard Horowitz: “Aids and Ebola Viruses Were Man-Made”

“National Radio journalists shocked Audience in San Francisco – “AIDS and Ebola viruses did not originate from monkeys left alone in the wild – they were bio-engineered in American laboratories.”

That was what internationally known public health authority with Harvard credentials, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz said, based on a review of more than 2,500 government documents and scientific reports, some gained through the Freedom of Information Act and never before revealed to the general public.

The Gary Null show, originating in New York, on WBAI radio, syndicated in twenty cities and listened to more than a million people, aired this information,  during an hour interview with Dr. Horowitz beginning on Tuesday, April 23, in the year 1996, from 12:00 to 1:00 PM e.s.t., and later in the week throughout the country. Listeners learned that HIV-1, and its parent, HIV-2, have been traced to National Cancer Institute (NCI) and military funded cancer virus experiments which used infected African green monkeys to produce vaccines intended to prevent hepatitis, leukemia, and other cancers.

What a medical coincidence? The documented evidence revealed in Dr. Horowitz’s new book, Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola – Nature, Accident or Genocide? (Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 1996), shows that NCI researchers, during the 1960’s, mixed viral genes from different animals to produce leukemia, sarcoma, general wasting, aimed to spread diseases and death.

This provided the “cancer models” used to study human cancer and human trial vaccine. The book which firstly described in-depth, the exploration into the origins of Aids and Ebola, and its controversial conclusions, offended many top Aids researchers and gave attention to those who have long questioned the green monkey theory and feared disease outbreaks from viral vaccine experiments.

Reconciling the origin of Aids and Ebola, as Dr. Horowitz did, was important for several reasons: Firstly, many feel that victims of Aids should not be blamed for starting the epidemic. With this evidence, those living with HIV/Aids may now be freed from the stigma, shame, and guilt associated with the infection – a boost to their natural immunity.

Secondly, new therapies might be developed from a better understanding of HIV’s origin and thirdly, the events precipitating such epidemics should never be allowed to happen again. It is ethically important to understand and therefore prevent future outbreaks. Finally, those directly implicated in HIV’s development and transmission is the same individuals and institutions capitalizing on the epidemic and humanity’s suffering.

Though many might consider this preposterous, as one Emerging Viruses review recently cautioned, “withhold any out-of-hand dismissal until you read this book,” or tune into Dr. Null’s extraordinary program.

http://www.lightparty.com/Health/AidsEbola.html

While it is well understood what happens to the human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes Aids, once it is inside the human body, it remains unknown how HIV got into humans to become one of the world’s worst plagues. Depending on whom you ask, the answer lies with monkey hunters in Africa or a polio vaccine given to people in the Congo in the 1950s.

The latter hypothesis is the subject of a documentary that premiered in the United States last week at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York City. The Origins of Aids, directed by Peter Chappell and Catherine Peix, follows the evidence laid out by British journalist Edward Hooper in his 1999 book, ‘The River.’ In his book, Hooper proposed (based on nearly two decades of research) that one man’s part in the race to create the polio vaccine launched the AIDS epidemic.

Hooper’s conclusion, described by one biologist in the film as “Medical science’s worst-hated hypothesis” directly challenges the findings of other investigators who were interviewed for the documentary, but whose diverging opinions ended up on the cutting-room floor. “The public doesn’t hear my view, nor does it hear the view of anybody else who has doubts about this theory,” said Beatrice Hahn, a professor of medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Hahn’s work tracking chimpanzees in the forests of Africa has produced a conclusion that nearly everyone agrees upon HIV originally came from chimpanzees. But how and when the virus that infects chimpanzees, simian immunodeficiency virus, or SIV, became HIV is where Hooper and his detractors diverge.

Several scientists, including Hahn, pinpointed bush-meat hunting, an African practice during which hunters can incur bites or cuts while hunting or preparing wild animals (including chimpanzees) for food. “From all the things we know, it’s pretty clear that it crossed the species barrier naturally,” said Dr. Michael Worobey, assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Arizona, who has worked with Hahn to track the simian beginnings of HIV.

Hooper’s theory, which forms the plot line of the documentary, argues against the bush-meat hypothesis. If bush-meat hunting was a historical practice, Hooper wondered, why did the AIDS epidemic only take off in the latter half of the 20th century? He found his answer in one of the science’s most noble endeavors: polio eradication.

The film profiles Dr. Hilary Koprowski, an American scientist in competition with Dr. Albert Sabin and Dr. Jonas Salk, to create the polio vaccine, primarily in the 1950s. Koprowski tested his oral vaccine in the Belgian Congo. By mapping locations where the vaccinations were given and early cases of AIDS emerged. Hooper showed a geographic correlation between the two. The first documented case of HIV is from a blood sample taken in the Congo in 1959.

“The location coincided dramatically,” writes Hooper on his website. “The earliest known cases of AIDS occurred in central Africa, in the same regions where Koprowski’s polio vaccine was given to over a million people, fro 1957-1960.” So, how could a monkey give a virus to humans? In the documentary, grainy archival footage of white-coated lab scientists, shows the polio virus being grown in a soup of chopped-up monkey organs before it is made into a vaccine, prime evidence of virus or contamination of vaccine creation.

Hooper charged Koprowski over the SIV-infected chimpanzee kidneys, which were used to grow the virus. The film cites a historical precedent: Another anti-polio campaign in the 1950s, injected millions of people with vaccines containing the monkey virus SV40, though none became ill from the injections.

[Note – According to many researchers and scientists, SV40, the contaminated Salk polio vaccines, have led to the cancer deaths (kidney and brain ) of tens of millions of Americans. The statement above: ‘though none became ill from the injections’ is total disinformation. That’s completely fabricated statement full of lies. Such lies prevent public panic.

Furthermore, the evidence that HIV was created by the US DoD bioweapons program and its various research contractors is compelling and well-documented. See the works of Dr. Lorraine Day, MD, Dr. Robert Strecker, MD, Dr. Alan Cantwell, MD, and Dr. Len Horowitz among others. All of these issues were covered in my own book, AIDS Exposed, published in 1990. – ed]

Scientists who worked with Koprowski denied that chimp kidneys were used

Independent testing of leftover samples of the vaccine in the United States, where it was produced using organs from other types of monkeys, showed no traces of chimp DNA or SIV. However, the documentary crew found several local workers in the Congo, who allegedly reported that chimpanzee kidneys were harvested and may have been used to produce more vaccine locally. Samples actually used in the Congo are no longer available for testing.

But even if Hooper proves this allegation conclusively, his detractors say he must still show that SIV transferred to humans at the right time, from the right monkeys, carrying the right virus.

Bette Korber, a staff scientist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, had “collaborated” with a supercomputer named Nirvana to chart the genetic history of HIV. Looking at the mutations the virus experienced from the mid-1980s to 1999, Korber created a molecular clock to determine the rate at which HIV changes.

NEW EBOLA 6

Using that rate and calculating backward, she and Nirvana dated the last common ancestor of HIV, the virus from which all present variations descended, to 1931. If Korber is right, the virus must have jumped from monkeys to humans before that date and well before Koprowski was trying out his vaccine. Korber published her results in the journal Nature in 2000.

While Korber and her computer contributed a timeline to the debate, Hahn has traipsed through the jungles of Africa picking up chimp feces and urine. Analyzing those samples for genetic traces of SIV, she has found that different subspecies of chimpanzees harbor different variants of SIV, and only one of those variants is the likely ancestor of HIV-1, the virus responsible for infecting more than 60 million people worldwide.

“In 1999 we published a paper in Nature that said that not all chimpanzee viruses are the likely source of HIV-1, only those found in West Central Africa are,” said Hahn. Hahn’s findings place the probable origin of the epidemic west of Koprowski’s vaccination campaign.

More recently, Hahn and Worobey published findings from a trip to the Democratic Republic of the Congo on April 22, 2004, in an issue of Nature. The team went to the region where Koprowski’s vaccine campaign was carried out and collected 97 fecal and urine samples. One contained genetic traces of SIV, but it was not the right kind. “It was on the wrong branch of the phylogenetic tree,” said Worobey. “So instead of being a sister virus to HIV-1, it was a distant cousin,” he continues.

Some investigators agree with Hooper

“What Hooper got right was the timing,” said Preston Marx, chairman of the microbiology and immunology division at the Tulane National Primate Research Center. “It looks like it mostly happened after World War II and into the early 60s.” Since the bush-meat trade was in place well before that, Marx thinks human intervention must have created the rapid spread in the second half of the century. Still, Marx doesn’t believe that chimpanzee kidneys were used to make Koprowski’s vaccine, and, even if they were, he is unsure that the virus, which normally requires blood-to-blood or blood-to-mucosal transmission, could be passed through organs used in a vaccine.

http://www.amazon.com/Greatest-Medical-History-Against-Mankind-ebook/dp/B016W89W1G