The development Of Ebola Laboratory By Hitler’s Vassals In USA, Russia, Germany, Belgium And The Philippines.

Marburg 2

By Johan Van Dongen and Joel Savage

Western journalists, soldiers, politicians, as well as scientists, now over more than a decade after the second millennium, should realize what exactly took place in the last two hundred years on the African continent. Africa is used as a dumping ground for drugs, testing of drugs, exposing people to bio-warfare products and deliveries of war material to the wrong regimes, which have adversely affected the continent as well.

Actually you could say that the rest of the world have seriously abused Africa and degraded its people, as if they are creatures walking around on earth without brains, yet Africans are in the same products of Quantum Physics and Quantum Mechanics realized as whites, so I don’t understand why the many white leaders have taken advantage to treat blacks unfairly?

The aforementioned establishments should know what actually took place on the continent of Africa and therefore should also be aware of the fact that the United States Of  America, that claim ‘In God We Trust’  turned against God and became a land which supported Hitler’s evil and Nazi war criminals.

The shocking story of how America became one of the world’s safest postwar havens for Nazis, has revealed in Eric Lichtblau’s remarkable book: “The Nazis Next door. How America becomes a safe haven for Hitler’s men.”

Thousands of Nazis from concentration camps, guards to high-level officers in the Third Reich and other Nazi criminals, came to the United States after World War II and settled quietly to begin a new life. They had little trouble getting in, with scant scrutiny, many gained entry on their own as self-styled war “refugees,” avoiding the detection of their criminal history and their war crimes soon forgotten. But some had help and protection from the U.S. government.

The CIA, FBI, and the military, gave support to Hitler’s minions to work as spies, intelligence assets, and leading scientists and engineers, whitewashing their histories.

In the United States of America, the Nazi war criminals collaborated with top American scientists, to manufacture viruses of deadly diseases, financed by the CIA, the Rockefeller Foundation and their counterparts the Rothschilds, thus; Ebola and Aids viruses were some of the engineered diseases and spread by the Germans and Americans.

The same Nazi war criminals became normal American citizens, while years after the Second World War, the Jews captured in war concentration camps, were still going through the cruelties of life.  In America, the Nazi criminals taught students and they found out the way of making deadly viruses in animals. Financed by Bill Gates, vaccines were contaminated with the deadly viruses to be inflicted on Africans.

All the manufactured viruses, such as the Ebola virus got their names according to how they were prepared in the concerned laboratory or how it originated. But can someone for a moment think of and ask the reason Aids and Ebola have killed thousands of Africans.

*In 1989, the CDC reports, Ebola-Reston virus was introduced into quarantine facilities in Virginia and Pennsylvania by monkeys imported from the Philippines. No humans were infected.

*In 1990, Ebola-Reston virus was introduced once again into quarantine facilities in Virginia and Texas by monkeys imported from the Philippines. Four humans developed antibodies but did not get sick.

*In 1996, Ebola-Reston virus was introduced into a quarantine facility in Texas by monkeys imported from the Philippines. No human infections were identified.

*In May of 2004, a Russian scientist died of Ebola after accidentally pricking herself with a syringe while conducting research on infected guinea pigs in Siberia.

*A similar accident with Ebola had reportedly occurred several months earlier at the US Army’s biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md., but the researcher involved didn’t acquire the disease. This incident is not listed on the CDC’s list of confirmed outbreaks, perhaps because the researcher didn’t develop antibodies.

In 2009, a scientist in Berlin, Germany accidentally pricked herself and was infected with Ebola. She was given an experimental vaccine as part of her treatment and did not become ill.

And only accidentally somebody dies because of a stupid accident. And what about all those students who are writing scientific papers and abstracts, as three of them are depicted, published in top medical journals in the last seventy years! Because Aids and Ebola viruses were man-made long before their outbreaks in black communities in Africa.

Lethal experimental infections of rhesus monkeys by aerosolized Ebola virus

Johnson E1, Jaax N, White J, Jahrling P,

Int J Exp Pathol. 1995 Aug;76(4):227-36.

Abstract

The potential of aerogenic infection by Ebola virus was established by using a head-only exposure aerosol system. Virus-containing droplets of 0.8-1.2 microns were generated and administered into the respiratory tract of rhesus monkeys via inhalation. Inhalation of viral doses as low as 400 plaque-forming units of virus caused a rapidly fatal disease in 4-5 days.

The illness was clinically identical to that reported for parenteral virus inoculation, except for the occurrence of subcutaneous and venipuncture site bleeding and serosanguineous nasal discharge. Immunocytochemistry revealed cell-associated Ebola virus antigens present in airway epithelium, alveolar pneumocytes, and macrophages in the lung and pulmonary lymph nodes; extracellular antigen was present on mucosal surfaces of the nose, oropharynx, and airways.

Aggregates of the characteristic filamentous virus were present within the type I pneumocytes, macrophages, and air spaces of the lung by electron microscopy. Demonstration of fatal aerosol transmission of this virus in monkeys reinforces the importance of taking appropriate precautions to prevent its potential aerosol transmission to humans.

Transmission of Ebola virus (Zaire strain) to uninfected control monkeys in a biocontainment laboratory

Jaax N1, Jahrling P, Geisbert T, Geisbert J, teele K, McKee K, Nagley D, Johnson E, Jaax G, Peters C.

Lancet. 1995 Dec 23-30;346(8991-8992):1669-71.

Abstract

Secondary transmission of Ebola virus infection in humans is known to be caused by direct contact with infected patients or body fluids. We report transmission of Ebola virus (Zaire strain) to two of three control rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) that did not have direct contact with experimentally inoculated monkeys held in the same room.

The two control monkeys died from Ebola virus infections at 10 and 11 days after the last experimentally inoculated monkey had died. The most likely route of infection of the control monkeys was aerosol, oral or conjunctival exposure to virus-laden droplets secreted or excreted from the experimentally inoculated monkeys. These observations suggest approaches to the study of routes of transmission to and among humans.

Lethal experimental infection of rhesus monkeys with Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga) virus by the oral and conjunctival route of exposure

Davis K.J, Geisbert TJ, Vogel P, Jaax GP, Topper M, Jahrling PB.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Feb;120(2):140-55.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The source of infection or mode of transmission of Ebola virus to human index cases of Ebola fever has not been established. Field observations in outbreaks of Ebola fever indicate that secondary transmission of Ebola virus is linked to improper needle hygiene, direct contact with infected tissue or fluid samples, and close contact with infected patients.

While it is presumed that the virus infects through either break in the skin or contact with mucous membranes, the only two routes of exposure that have been experimentally validated are parenteral inoculation and aerosol inhalation. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that aerosol exposure is not an important means of virus transmission in natural outbreaks of human Ebola fever; this study was designed to verify that Ebola virus could be effectively transmitted by oral or conjunctival exposure in nonhuman primates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were exposed to Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga) virus orally (N=4), conjunctively (N=4), or by intramuscular inoculation (N=1, virus-positive control).

RESULTS

Four of seven monkeys exposed by the conjunctival route, three of four monkeys exposed by the oral route, and the intramuscularly inoculated positive control monkey were successfully infected with Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga). Seven monkeys died of Ebola fever between days 7 and 8 post-exposure, but one of the monkeys given aggressive supportive therapy and a platelet transfusion; lived until day 12 post-exposure.

Marburg

Belgian scientist and discoverer of Ebola, Peter Piot, knew everything about the virus but wouldn’t say publicly was a medical crime against Africa, because his country was involved.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the experiment study confirm that Ebola virus can be effectively transmitted via the oral or conjunctival route of exposure in nonhuman primates.

Well, Nazi students prepared many dangerous viruses, thus; everyone blames them for the crimes they committed, but the real question is: Who discovered officially those devilish and deadly viruses? It was a Belgian scientist named Peter Piot!

Peter Piot

Nearly 40 years ago, a young Belgian scientist traveled to a remote part of the Congolese rainforest – his task was to help find out why so many people were dying from an unknown and terrifying disease. In September 1976, a package containing a shiny blue thermos flask arrived at the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, Belgium.

Working in the lab that day was Peter Piot, a 27-year-old scientist and medical school graduate training as a clinical microbiologist. “It was just a normal flask like any other you would use to keep coffee warm,” recalls Piot, now Director of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. But this thermos wasn’t carrying coffee – altogether inside was a different cargo.

Nestled among a few melting ice cubes were vials of blood along with a note. It was a Belgian doctor based in what was then Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of Congo – his handwritten message explained that the blood was that of a nun, also from Belgium, who had fallen ill with a mysterious illness which he couldn’t identify.

The samples were treated like others, lab tested, but when the scientists placed some of the cells under an electron microscope they saw something they didn’t expect. “We saw a gigantic worm-like structure – gigantic by viral standards,” says Piot. It was a very unusual shape for a virus, only one other virus looked like that of the Marburg virus.” The Marburg virus was first discovered in 1967 when 31 people became ill with hemorrhagic fever in the cities of Marburg and Frankfurt in Germany and in Belgrade, the capital of Yugoslavia.

This Marburg outbreak was associated with laboratory staffs who were working with infected monkeys imported from Uganda – seven people died. Piot knew how serious Marburg could be – but after consulting experts around the world, he got confirmation that what he was seeing under the microscope wasn’t Marburg, but different which hasn’t been seen before. After that what’s next?Marburg

Advertisements